![]() ![]() None of the above dictates a necessity for vector paths for screen printing. All an auto-trace routine does is abide by a color-variance tolerance by which it treats a certain range of adjacent colors as if they are the same, and then tries to draw a path around them. Each pixel has a fixed color value pixels don't graduate. The auto-trace is not going to automatically figure out how to make grad-filled objects out of what merely looks to you like a grad. So in order to recreate the gradient, I would have to redraw the lettering, and physically recreate the gradient in Illustrator? Auto-trace an RGB or CMYK raster image, then run a color-replacement routine to swap out the colors to the nearest matching swatches of a pre-defined set.Auto-trace an RGB or CMYK raster image, then select the resulting objects of a particluar fill color and re-apply a spot color swatch afterwards.Pre-define a set of spot colors for the auto-trace routine to use.What color mode and format is the raster image you are tracing? You're not normally going to automatically get Pantone-specific spot color separations when auto-tracing an RGB or CMYK raster image. The halftoning of the seps is a printer function. Has no bearing on the necessity of raster vs. Keep the halftones "fine"? As opposed to course? (Keep the halftone frequency high?). ![]() You print separations on transparency film from Corel DRAW X4. We run Corel X4 on our transparency machine We run Corel X4 on our transparency machine, so I need to convert to vector, and keep the halftones fine, as well as keep the pantone color book.Įxplain better. ![]() Screen printing does not necessitate vector-based graphics. Before anyone says "you don't need to use vector for screen printing" ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |